8th Jewelry Technology Forum at the Vicenza Fair, Trissino Room, 15 Jan 12 (free entry)
The Jewelry Technology Forum is a highly successful symposium in terms of both participation and content. JTF is the place to obtain information on the latest developments and trends in jewelry production. The 2012 seminar will feature two important themes: colour and the new selective laser melting technology, a potential revolution for jewelry production.
Click on the link below for a list of key speakers and further information on Legor Group's website... http://www.legor.com/index.php?pagina=pagina_generica.php&id=431
Thursday, 5 January 2012
Featured Guild Members for Jan 12
We are delighted that Birgit Kaler and Patricia Tschetter are Featured Argentium Guild Members for January 12. You can find out more about them and see some of their work here... http://www.argentiumguild.com/#!__featured-members
Tarnish Resistance and its Measurement.
So, what is tarnish? Simply, it is a dark discoloration on the surface of silver items predominantly caused by their exposure and reaction with sulphur present in the air (as pollution) in compounds such as sulphur dioxide or hydrogen sulphide. The rate at which tarnish occurs is also influenced by higher ambient temperatures or higher humidity levels.
I have written previously (Blog Post, 22nd March 2011, Different Silver Alloys) about the different types of silver alloys available. Some of these other silver alloys also claim improved tarnish resistance, so in this article I want to discuss how to test silver alloys to best assess their relative tarnish resistance.
The most important thing to say about tarnish testing is that no individual test can match the complexity of the real-life conditions to which a silver item will be subjected. The temperature, light intensity and levels of pollution vary room by room and location by location, so any meaningful testing of tarnish resistance needs to consider the different factors which influence this reaction.
Generally the silver industry considers only one aspect of tarnish resistance that of sulphur attack in assessing its tarnish resistant alloys. The Argentium approach is more demanding and we require alloys to pass three different tests before they are considered tarnish resistant, these are:
Sulphur test - This test is based on a standardised corrosion testing procedure (ISO 4538) used within the precious metals industry which utilises a chemical called thioacetamide to reproduce the effects of sulphur and sulphurous gases found in the atmosphere and everyday substances.
Perspiration (sweat) test – This test reproduces the effects of perspiration and skin contact with silver alloys and is based on a standardised procedure (ISO 12870) used in the spectacles industry to asses the perspiration resistance of spectacle frames when in contact with an artificial sweat solution.
Ultraviolet light test – This test determines whether alloys are photosensitive to ultraviolet light, this is especially applicable to silver articles that are on display and exposed to sunlight. Ultraviolet light is known to influence the creation of ozone (specifically light at a wavelength of 185nm); ozone can be considered an ‘active oxygen’ molecule which can act greatly increase the rate of tarnish of a silver alloy
To standardise the tests pieces of a regular sterling alloy are always included to provide a base reference sample and to quantify the testing the assessment of the alloys tarnish resistance is carried out by colour measurements using the CIELab system (Blog Post, 5th September 2011, How Silver is Silver?).
Argentium silver alloys are required to demonstrate superior tarnish resistance in all of these tests and in future posts I will explore how the colour measurement data from the CIELab testing can be used to assess the relative tarnish resistance of the different types of silver alloy.
I have written previously (Blog Post, 22nd March 2011, Different Silver Alloys) about the different types of silver alloys available. Some of these other silver alloys also claim improved tarnish resistance, so in this article I want to discuss how to test silver alloys to best assess their relative tarnish resistance.
The most important thing to say about tarnish testing is that no individual test can match the complexity of the real-life conditions to which a silver item will be subjected. The temperature, light intensity and levels of pollution vary room by room and location by location, so any meaningful testing of tarnish resistance needs to consider the different factors which influence this reaction.
Generally the silver industry considers only one aspect of tarnish resistance that of sulphur attack in assessing its tarnish resistant alloys. The Argentium approach is more demanding and we require alloys to pass three different tests before they are considered tarnish resistant, these are:
Sulphur test - This test is based on a standardised corrosion testing procedure (ISO 4538) used within the precious metals industry which utilises a chemical called thioacetamide to reproduce the effects of sulphur and sulphurous gases found in the atmosphere and everyday substances.
Perspiration (sweat) test – This test reproduces the effects of perspiration and skin contact with silver alloys and is based on a standardised procedure (ISO 12870) used in the spectacles industry to asses the perspiration resistance of spectacle frames when in contact with an artificial sweat solution.
Ultraviolet light test – This test determines whether alloys are photosensitive to ultraviolet light, this is especially applicable to silver articles that are on display and exposed to sunlight. Ultraviolet light is known to influence the creation of ozone (specifically light at a wavelength of 185nm); ozone can be considered an ‘active oxygen’ molecule which can act greatly increase the rate of tarnish of a silver alloy
To standardise the tests pieces of a regular sterling alloy are always included to provide a base reference sample and to quantify the testing the assessment of the alloys tarnish resistance is carried out by colour measurements using the CIELab system (Blog Post, 5th September 2011, How Silver is Silver?).
Argentium silver alloys are required to demonstrate superior tarnish resistance in all of these tests and in future posts I will explore how the colour measurement data from the CIELab testing can be used to assess the relative tarnish resistance of the different types of silver alloy.
Thursday, 8 December 2011
Argentium Silver Video
Here is the updated Argentium Silver video on YouTube. This is an excellent educational tool, explaining and illustrating the benefits of Argentium Silver. Test results are shown and a wide variety of products are showcased. Please feel free to link to or embed the video: http://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=RQ8N5Yopam0
Thursday, 1 December 2011
Featured Guild Members - Dec 11
We are delighted that Joana Miranda and Jan Peyser are featured Guild Members for December 2011. You can see more of their jewellery designs and read about their work on the Guild website...
http://www.argentiumguild.com/#!__featured-members
http://www.argentiumguild.com/#!__featured-members
Tuesday, 29 November 2011
Porosity in Investment Castings
Porosity is the most common defect found in investment castings. Its incidence can be greatly reduced by following a few simple guidelines but first it is important to diagnose what type of porosity you are getting in your pieces.
There are two causes of porosity in a casting; shrinkage on cooling or gas entrapment.
Shrinkage Porosity shows itself as small holes on the surface of a casting. When these holes are closely inspected using a magnifying glass they are seen to be angular, with a dendritic or grainy structure inside. Shrinkage porosity is the most common type of porosity and is generally found on large surface area pieces, parts that have shanks which increase in thickness and also in parts with that contain many angles and changes of section thickness. It occurs due to the non-uniform solidification of the piece on cooling as the metal actually tries to tear itself to pieces as it solidifies. This is due to insufficient molten metal being available to feed into the solidifying casting.
Gas Porosity typically shows itself as pin holes on the surface of the casting. These holes are generally round and smooth in nature, compared to the more angular holes of shrinkage porosity. In some cases the holes are concentrated in a layer just below the cast surface; these are not visible after casting but show up after polishing. There are generally two reasons for this type of defect occurring, either reaction with the investment powder or impurities been introduced through re-cycled metal.
The main causes of Shrinkage Porosity and the corrective actions to take are:
1) The piece has been incorrectly sprued
The sprue should be attached to the heaviest section of the pattern. This is because this area will be the last part of the casting to freeze and therefore there will be plenty of molten metal available for the piece as it contracts and solidifies. It is advisable, where possible, to use a round gate rather than a square or flat one as this prevents the point of contact between the sprue and the piece been cast become a ‘choke-point’ of restricted metal flow.
2) The piece has been sprued flat
Attach the piece to the centre sprue at a 45 degree angle rather than a horizontal 90 degree plane. This will assist the metal in flowing ‘downhill’ into the piece been cast.
3) Inadequate sprueing (too few or too small
The sprue is designed to supply the molten metal into cavity left by the melting of the wax pattern. If the sprue is too small it will solidify before the actual piece being cast; similarly if you only have a single sprue feeding a complex casting then it may also solidify before the extremities of the piece. This means that the piece cannot draw any feed metal from the centre sprue and shrinkage porosity will result. The solution is simple; provide an adequate number of suitably sized sprues to feed each casting.
4) The flask temperature is too high
If the flask temperature is too high the risk of shrinkage problems is increased. In general it is good practice to keep your flask temperature as low as possible while still maintaining a complete fill of the parts been cast as this also reduces the risk of metal/mould reactions.
5. The castings are too close to either the bottom or the top of the tree
The button of the tree (I call this the top of the casting) is obviously open to air and will cool more quickly. This cooling effect could be passed to the first row of pieces been cast so a 2 cm gap from the button to the first row of castings is recommended. Similarly at the very end of the tree (what I call the bottom) as this is filled with metal first, it will solidify first so it is not recommended to sprue pieces at the very end of the tree. Again a 2 cm gap is to be recommended.
The main causes of Gas Porosity and the corrective actions to take are:
1) The metal has been overheated or the flask is to hot.
Overheating the metal increases the risk of a metal/investment powder reaction occurring. The metal and flask temperatures should be sufficient to ensure complete fill of the pieces been cast, but in general, it is not necessary when casting silver alloys to exceed 1020C (1868F) and usually it is possible to cast at lower temperatures than this. Overheating the metal or the flask can result in the calcium sulphate in the investment powder decomposing to form a sulphur gas which can be trapped in the solidifying metal causing gas porosity.
2) Inadequate wax burnout
If there is any carbon residue left from the wax burnout then this can lead to a reaction with the molten metal as it enters the mould leading to gas entrapment just below the surface skin of the casting. To prevent this ensure that the investment powder manufacturer’s recommended burnout cycle is followed, particularly with regard to the holding time at the maximum burnout temperature.
3) Inadequate air flow in burnout oven
If the button of the casting shows a yellow ring on the investment powder after casting or there is dark colour on the investment powder next to the casting then this is probably due to a sulphur gas reaction involving the investment powder. This is due to the flask been heated in an oven where there has not been sufficient air flow to carry away the gases evolved during the flask burnout cycle. Usually this is associated with the burnout oven being overloaded with flasks but airflow through the oven can be increased by drilling holes in the bottom of the burnout oven door.
4) Scrap used contaminated with investment powder
The use of any scrap material introduces the risk of impurities or contaminants been introduced into the molten metal. It is a good general guideline not to exceed 50% of scrap in any casting. Where scrap sprues and trees are been used they should be thoroughly cleaned of any residual investment powder. The presence of any impurities or investment powder can lead to a chemical reaction involving gas evolution which then becomes trapped in the cooling casting.
To summarise these points remember; clean metal feedstock, metal and flask temperatures as low as possible and use an adequate number of sprues. This should ensure that you produce investment castings of a consistently high quality.
There are two causes of porosity in a casting; shrinkage on cooling or gas entrapment.
Shrinkage Porosity shows itself as small holes on the surface of a casting. When these holes are closely inspected using a magnifying glass they are seen to be angular, with a dendritic or grainy structure inside. Shrinkage porosity is the most common type of porosity and is generally found on large surface area pieces, parts that have shanks which increase in thickness and also in parts with that contain many angles and changes of section thickness. It occurs due to the non-uniform solidification of the piece on cooling as the metal actually tries to tear itself to pieces as it solidifies. This is due to insufficient molten metal being available to feed into the solidifying casting.
Gas Porosity typically shows itself as pin holes on the surface of the casting. These holes are generally round and smooth in nature, compared to the more angular holes of shrinkage porosity. In some cases the holes are concentrated in a layer just below the cast surface; these are not visible after casting but show up after polishing. There are generally two reasons for this type of defect occurring, either reaction with the investment powder or impurities been introduced through re-cycled metal.
The main causes of Shrinkage Porosity and the corrective actions to take are:
1) The piece has been incorrectly sprued
The sprue should be attached to the heaviest section of the pattern. This is because this area will be the last part of the casting to freeze and therefore there will be plenty of molten metal available for the piece as it contracts and solidifies. It is advisable, where possible, to use a round gate rather than a square or flat one as this prevents the point of contact between the sprue and the piece been cast become a ‘choke-point’ of restricted metal flow.
2) The piece has been sprued flat
Attach the piece to the centre sprue at a 45 degree angle rather than a horizontal 90 degree plane. This will assist the metal in flowing ‘downhill’ into the piece been cast.
3) Inadequate sprueing (too few or too small
The sprue is designed to supply the molten metal into cavity left by the melting of the wax pattern. If the sprue is too small it will solidify before the actual piece being cast; similarly if you only have a single sprue feeding a complex casting then it may also solidify before the extremities of the piece. This means that the piece cannot draw any feed metal from the centre sprue and shrinkage porosity will result. The solution is simple; provide an adequate number of suitably sized sprues to feed each casting.
4) The flask temperature is too high
If the flask temperature is too high the risk of shrinkage problems is increased. In general it is good practice to keep your flask temperature as low as possible while still maintaining a complete fill of the parts been cast as this also reduces the risk of metal/mould reactions.
5. The castings are too close to either the bottom or the top of the tree
The button of the tree (I call this the top of the casting) is obviously open to air and will cool more quickly. This cooling effect could be passed to the first row of pieces been cast so a 2 cm gap from the button to the first row of castings is recommended. Similarly at the very end of the tree (what I call the bottom) as this is filled with metal first, it will solidify first so it is not recommended to sprue pieces at the very end of the tree. Again a 2 cm gap is to be recommended.
The main causes of Gas Porosity and the corrective actions to take are:
1) The metal has been overheated or the flask is to hot.
Overheating the metal increases the risk of a metal/investment powder reaction occurring. The metal and flask temperatures should be sufficient to ensure complete fill of the pieces been cast, but in general, it is not necessary when casting silver alloys to exceed 1020C (1868F) and usually it is possible to cast at lower temperatures than this. Overheating the metal or the flask can result in the calcium sulphate in the investment powder decomposing to form a sulphur gas which can be trapped in the solidifying metal causing gas porosity.
2) Inadequate wax burnout
If there is any carbon residue left from the wax burnout then this can lead to a reaction with the molten metal as it enters the mould leading to gas entrapment just below the surface skin of the casting. To prevent this ensure that the investment powder manufacturer’s recommended burnout cycle is followed, particularly with regard to the holding time at the maximum burnout temperature.
3) Inadequate air flow in burnout oven
If the button of the casting shows a yellow ring on the investment powder after casting or there is dark colour on the investment powder next to the casting then this is probably due to a sulphur gas reaction involving the investment powder. This is due to the flask been heated in an oven where there has not been sufficient air flow to carry away the gases evolved during the flask burnout cycle. Usually this is associated with the burnout oven being overloaded with flasks but airflow through the oven can be increased by drilling holes in the bottom of the burnout oven door.
4) Scrap used contaminated with investment powder
The use of any scrap material introduces the risk of impurities or contaminants been introduced into the molten metal. It is a good general guideline not to exceed 50% of scrap in any casting. Where scrap sprues and trees are been used they should be thoroughly cleaned of any residual investment powder. The presence of any impurities or investment powder can lead to a chemical reaction involving gas evolution which then becomes trapped in the cooling casting.
To summarise these points remember; clean metal feedstock, metal and flask temperatures as low as possible and use an adequate number of sprues. This should ensure that you produce investment castings of a consistently high quality.
Thursday, 27 October 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



